I have finished measuring out the threads and now they are on the loom. I tied the bundles up carefully in a number of crucial places and put leash sticks through the cross to hold it while I "wind on" to the back beam. The goal of this process is to store the extra warp that I am not weaving very neatly until I need to weave it. Maintaining thread tension and "the cross" are important here. More on that below.
The piece of wood with nails that I've clamped on to the back breast beam is a raddle. The raddle contributes to thread order. Read what Peggy Ostercamp has to say about my particular situation. Mayhaps I didn't see this advice before I tied on.
Now, some opinions. I will confess that these are dark days on the south end of my apartment:
Also see: Remembering, repeating and working-through; Beyond the Pleasure Principle
And: Berlin on Machiavelli
I have worked with this yarn before. I have worked with this yarn before. Last time was no different, and yet.
The threads want to stick together. They do not want to flow freely onto the back beam. This yarn is not an easy warp. Not before, not now. How had I forgotten? I forgot on purpose.
The only way to persevere is to forget.
I read that Freud said (sometimes criticism is more fun than primary sources I'll admit it) that a return to the old traumas is needed to master them. We forget, then repeat, in the hope of becoming an active not passive force against the same experience. Maybe not so useful for general life function but I like to adapt this psychological habit to weaving as a way to keep weaving.If I had remembered the yarn as it is, (unbalanced, sticky) I would have not used it. I would not be getting the cloth I want. When it is all over I'll be glad I did it. Too late now anyway. Builds character.
Fun fact: sometimes we never work through it.
Previously, I spoke of doom and gloom with respect to "losing the cross." Why obsess over maintaining thread order? My weaving teacher used to put it like this, perhaps for the benefit of the many teachers in her classes:
"Threads are like a room full of kids. If you let one misbehave, soon they all are." Personally, I would go further.
To weave successfully, you must be a dictator of threads. Every thread is a tiny rebel. It doesn't want to be cloth. It has no concept of cloth. It is wound up in one direction, and all it wants to do is unwind in the other. Yarn does not care if the entire edifice comes crashing down along the way.
Really, just one thread out of place? Yes, your possible ruin. It starts colluding with a few threads. Then all the threads in the inch around it. As we wind along eight yards of warp, this one thread has formed a knot around yard three. Attempt to undo the knot and you will miss an problem a few inches to the left, now at yard four the first thread is still leading charges with the remainder of its insurrectionist force from its hilltop encampments while the second group of threads has just begun a new set of skirmishes. Meanwhile a third sleeper cell is taking advantage of your growing distraction and despair to burn your capital around yard six.
One thread out of place: every future boulevard, park and monument you had planned in your name disappears like tears into the snarled, matted warp in front of you.
Take any action you need to solve a problem with a thread the moment you detect it. This includes surgical scissors (I have five pairs.) Surveil your warp at all times. You cannot predict where the next step out of line will occur. Some threads can be rehabilitated. Others are best snipped away and replaced. When in doubt, snip. You cannot afford mercy.
So that you may understand, I have made a video of the process of winding on. If you turn on sound, you will hear the world-weary sigh of the tyrant whose security forces have just informed her of protesters in the main square.
I feel strongly because I have seen many kingdoms fall.
The coastal cloth is getting close to the earthquake that will revision the barrier between land and sea; the plates are going to grind into each other, crust will crumble, and a new seashore will emerge (which means that the coastal cloth will be finished.) This news letter will continue (I hope you keep reading I've enjoyed all the input!) and I'll continue to keep the focus on one project.
A quick poll: would you rather hear about receding glaciers, ice sheets scraping away to reveal an old history made anew, or see how I might design a blanket that tries to be the most successful blanket yet?
The second cloth at eighteen inches didn't take long. I mostly struggled with a conflict between the duty to "stick to the plan" and "whatever, let's go to the circus." *Whatever* won this time and fortunately my wanton structural shifts from double weave to random stripes of sateen and twill without really meditating on it turned out to be good instinct.
One might say, circus instincts. Or perhaps inevitable plate tectonics. I had room to sample.
Occasionally I hear, "you could sell this," and I know 100% that it is a compliment and I very much appreciate it. Yet, here I am I spending untold hours making a coastal cloth I plan to give away. (Actually "indefinite loan" actually "whoever casually claims some time from now will be its default custodian.") Rhetorically, why do I haul blankets around in my car trunk that I hand out at the slightest provocation? (Answers: "I think you're nifty; you are my aunt; I just learned you are going to grad school in a cold state.")
Ridiculous but true: it is my protest against corporate takeover of social mores, which maintains that corporations are people and that people should be corporations, brand and all, selling themselves at all times to survive.
I don't mind being bourgeoisie. It's quite comfortable actually! I do treasure(?) my chaotic inner life tho, which is sloppy and impulsive, much like my weaving. Circus colors hide a lot of threading mistakes. I do fear that to "brand" myself (are we that far away from livestock to not feel twitchy saying that?), to spend time actively cultivating an image that is just a bit artsy while preserving that down-to-earth glow endlessly and relentlessly on the internet while networking potential vendors, customers, and anyone I meet in the street would make the inside of my brainbox slow down and stop laughing at clowns. I'd rather leave the circus for a 9-5 then a nine-to-always.
Anyway, the recipients of my car trunk cloth always seem to appreciate that cloth more than I do. As far as I am concerned this multiplies its value tenfold. Thanks to all of you who have accepted my weaving! That one action on your part made the whole thing have a point. It's good to know that at least a small market segment responds well to "total chaos."
My friend at work and I talk about our hobbies during coffee breaks. He gave mug, but played it down, explaining that "he has a closet full of these things and he thought I would like it." I gave him a scarf for his wife because "I have a closet too."
A professional organizer found my wallet in the street (because I put it on the ground and forgot about it) and Google helpfully provided her with my website. She emailed me to set up a return, and when we met at the library I gave her a scarf from the closet. She was all "I was going to say no to anything you offered me but I'm really cold right now."
I mailed a rag rug to a friend in Portland after I found out he did not know what rag rugs were. Years ago, when he lived in Chicago, I made him one of my first designed cloths in the form of a scarf with University of Oregon colors. (Shouting at him in my kitchen, holding cones of yarn: IF I MADE YOU A SCARF FROM THESE COLORS WOULD YOU WEAR IT.) He's not really a "clothes" person but wore that scarf all the time and got on the "I got a closet" list for life because of his early support and open appreciation.
I have cloth in Colorado, Oregon, and Northern California. I have cloth in New York City, New York State, San Francisco. Of course Chicago. I want cloth everywhere. Blanket the world in blankets. Could I have this happiness if I valued my cloth in terms of dollars? Also rhetorical, you know the answer.